• News
  • Intel
  • Portfolio
  • Contact
  • Site Map

Knowledge is power! Discover what others already know and how you can use that information to your advantage.

Back To Intel

  • "Mad Men" - The Review
  • Mad Men

Monthly Archives

  • December 2008
  • September 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • October 2007
  • July 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006


Log-in to review your current projects.

Mad Men

Some sort of subtitle

Posted on July 19, 2007 | Permalink

Posted on July 19, 2007 | Permalink

By Lane Casteix

I just had to comment....

This new TV production is about the advertising industry in 1960 complete with cigarettes in every mouth, martinis in every hand, lots of infidelity, and very non-PC comments slipping out. Or so says Adam Hanft in his article at Slate.com.

I intend to watch it and give it a chance, but I am not usually excited about being bombarded by decadence and boorish behavior. There is enough of that in real life.

Mad Men airs on Thursdays at 9pm central time on AMC.

Review to follow....


UPDATE 20 July 07 -

Ten minutes into the show last night COX dropped the signal! So, until they rerun it, there will be no personal review. Meanwhile here is one from the Baltimore Sun to munch on.


ANOTHER UPDATE -

Here is a review by someone who was actually there. CAUTION: Rough language.

"Mad Men" - The Review

Some sort of subtitle

Posted on July 23, 2007 | Permalink

Posted on July 23, 2007 | Permalink

By Lane Casteix

We finally got to see the whole first episode. Interesting!

It does portray advertising as glamorous, which is one reason I joined the game. That was then, and "then" seems to be pretty well portrayed in Mad Men. The show does have some technical problems I found troubling, but if you aren't in advertising you might not have noticed.

As someone else pointed out in a review, the agency principal would never have gone into a meeting with a major client like Lucky Strike and not known what creative was going to be presented.

The creative director would never have gone into such a meeting with nothing to present. He would have done anything to get the meeting moved to give himself time come up with something.

The CD would never treat a prospective client the way he did the female owner of the department store. He may have thought or said those things behind her back, but never to her face. The reason: $$$$$$! And the principle would have nailed his hide to the drawing board with a thousand push pins. (That is some of the stuff we used before Macs came along.)

The account executive's admission that he is "not a people person," which was obviously true. Hello? Where is HR? The AE had better be a people person!

Good marketing research even then was valuable.

The last ditch creative effort with the Lucky Strike client that led to the headline, "It is toasted!" was interesting, and as I recall a headline they did use. The client's claim "all brands toast their tobacco" should have received a better answer from the CD. Even though all brands can make the same claim, the first one to stake that claim purposefully and forcefully owns the USP (unique selling point). The others will only come off as "wannabees" when they try to make the same claim.

And lastly, that IBM Selectric Typewriter that "only looks complicated, but they made it simple enough for a woman to use" - we still had two just like that before Katrina. They drowned.

The jury is still out for me. I liked the show enough, in spite of the glaring errors, to come back and view it again.

Return To Top

Be Seen | Be Heard | Be Known